Tamas

Tamas v. Department of Social & Health Services

Good Law
630 F.3d 833·2010 WL 5175000·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 26009
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 201018-55324California6,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

Enrique Fabregas (Fabregas) is a predator who slithered into the lives of vulnerable women with young daughters. There is no question that Fabregas molested his foster daughters, one of whom he legally adopted. The more challenging question this case presents is whether the State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) and nine DSHS employees’ involved in overseeing the foster care of Monica (Monica), Ruth Tamas (Ruth), and Estera Tamas (Estera) are legally responsible for the injuries inflicted by Fabregas.

Monica, Ruth, and Estera (Appellees) filed a lawsuit against DSHS and nine of its employees (Appellants) alleging negligence and civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Appellants filed a summary judgment motion asserting that the individual DSHS employees were entitled to absolute and qualified immunity. Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motion. Because the district court did not apply the correct standard in assessing whether qualified immunity applies, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this case for application of the correct standard, and for separate analysis of each Appellant’s prospective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.