Gang
Gang v. Hughes
Opinion
Opinion
Byrne, J.
The defendants have moved to dismiss an amended complaint alleging, libel and slander.
The pertinent averments of the amended complaint may be summarized as follows:
Plaintiff Gang is an attorney at law profitably engaged in the practice of law-in Los Angeles County; that prior- to the complained of acts he enjoyed a reputation above reproach; that he had been acting as attorney for Jean Simmons and Stewart Granger in litigation in which his clients were plaintiffs and Hughes was a defendant; that on July 17, 1952, said litigation was terminated and dismissed pursuant to a written agreement between the parties; that said written agreement provided that the defendants pay the attorney fees incurred by Simmons and Granger in connection with said litigation; that following the termination of said litigation, the defendants made oral and written statements to the press as follows: “ * ■* * that Gang, the Grangers’ attorney, had refused to consent to settlement until he got his money”, and “ * * * that he (Plughes) was paying Gang’s fee because the-attorney had insisted upon immediate payment” ; that the defendants made said statements for the reason that Hughes feared that the fact…