United States v. Miguel Ley

Good Law
407 F. App'x 132
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 201010-50053California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

On October 16, 2008, Miguel Ley was arrested by Border Patrol officers who discovered approximately 171 pounds of marijuana hidden in a diesel tank in the bed of Mr. Ley’s pickup truck. Mr. Ley was the driver, sole occupant, and owner of the truck.

On April 16, 2009, Mr. Ley was convicted of two counts: (1) importing in excess of 50 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960; and (2) possessing with intent to distribute in excess of 50 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). ER 171. He was sentenced to 30 months in custody and three years of supervised release. ER 172-173.

Mr. Ley appeals his conviction on two grounds. First, he argues that the prosecutor made improper remarks during closing argument and rebuttal that unfairly prejudiced him, and that the district court’s handling of those remarks constituted reversible error. Second, he argues that the district court erred in its instructions to the grand jury that they should indict in every case where there is probable cause.

As to the first ground, we conclude that the complained-of statements by the prosecutor were not improper, with one exception. Moreover, even if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.