Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Concurrence to the Certification Order and Per Curiam Opinion

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 201110-16696California1,906 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION JAN 04 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. No. 10-16696

STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J.

ZARRILLO, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, Plaintiffs - Appellees, San Francisco

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, CONCURRENCE TO THE

CERTIFICATION ORDER

Plaintiff - Intervenor - AND PER CURIAM OPINION Appellee,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.