Handschuh

Handschuh v. Superior Court

Good Law
166 Cal. App. 3d 41·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1812·212 Cal. Rptr. 296
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 1985A029109California1,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haning, J.

Petitioner Frederic Handschuh seeks review by prohibition or mandate of respondent court’s order granting summary adjudication of issues in his cause of action against real parties Osborne and other San Francisco police officers for seizure and loss of his property and violation of his civil rights arising out of the execution of a search warrant. Respondent court’s order bars petitioner’s cause of action under the federal Civil Rights Act, Title 42, United States Code section 1983 . We previously granted a stay of proceedings below, and now grant relief.

Real parties entered petitioner’s residence pursuant to a search warrant and seized a number of articles of personal property which were not de scribed in the warrant. It is conceded that the articles taken were not contraband or otherwise subject to seizure. Charges were brought against petitioner, but subsequently dismissed. Petitioner demanded return of the seized items, but was told they had been lost, destroyed or sold at auction. He then brought this action against real parties and the City and County of San Francisco for conversion, and against real parties under section 1983 for the initial seizure.

Real…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.