Anderson

Anderson v. Latimer

Good Law
166 Cal. App. 3d 667·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1864·212 Cal. Rptr. 544
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 1985Civ. 22543California3,615 words

Opinion

Opinion

Keeley, J.

Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Bruce Anderson, a minor, and against defendants Doris Anderson and Thomas Latimer. Plaintiff’s claim arose out of a two-car automobile collision. He was a passenger in a vehicle being operated by his mother, defendant Doris Anderson. He was injured when the Anderson vehicle was struck broadside by one being operated by defendant Thomas Carlton La-timer. The jury verdict found defendants equally at fault.

Defendant Anderson appeals. In a consolidated matter, defendant Latimer moves for a writ of mandate directing the trial court to approve a petition for compromise of claim of minor, and to find the compromise settlement to be one in “good faith” within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6. This writ relates to an alleged settlement between the minor plaintiff and defendant Latimer entered postjudgment and post notice of appeal while all issues were pending in this court.

We shall affirm the judgment and deny the petition for writ of mandate.

I

Discussion

On appeal, defendant Anderson argues: (1) the insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment as to her; (2) prejudicial error in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.