Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court

Bad Law
145 Cal. App. 3d 253·193 Cal. Rptr. 336
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 198321070California2,434 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephen J. Walwyn and Edward Niland for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

Petitioner, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (P.G.& E.), is the defendant in a personal injury action brought by real party in interest, Mark Sundberg (plaintiff). P.G.& E. seeks a writ of mandate ordering respondent superior court to set aside a ruling denying P.G.& E.'s motion for summary judgment. (1a) We issued an alternative writ to consider whether Civil Code section 846 immunizes P.G.& E. from liability for injuries plaintiff sustained while engaged in recreational boating on navigable waters which flow over P.G.& E.'s land. As we conclude that petitioner is not entitled to the protection of section 846, we shall deny the writ. [1]

On May 29, 1978, plaintiff and his family were camping at a United States Forest Service campground bordering Lake Shasta. Plaintiff launched his sailboat, a catamaran with an aluminum mast, from a nearby launching ramp supervised by forest service employees. Plaintiff's purpose was recreational. Once in the water, the boat drifted, the mast came into contact with P.G.& E. power lines overhanging the water, and plaintiff sustained the injuries which are the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.