Purdie

Underwriters Insurance v. Purdie

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 3d 57·193 Cal. Rptr. 248·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1902
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 1983Civ. 67097California4,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

In this case we deal with a dispute concerning coverage provided by the liability provisions of a multiperil liability insurance policy for a shooting incident on the insured premises of a liquor store. The trial court, in a declaratory relief action initiated by the insurance carrier, determined the firearm exclusion indorsement to the insurance policy precluded coverage. Judgment was entered declaring the insurance carrier has no duty to defend or indemnify the insured or its employee against the claim of third parties, Walter Atkinson and his wife, Casandra Atkinson, for bodily injuries. Walter and Casandra Atkinson (hereafter appellants) appeal from the judgment.

The insurance policy was issued by Underwriters Insurance Company (hereafter Underwriters) to Samuel James Porter and John Edward Purdie, doing business as Jax Liquor (hereafter insured). The policy consists of 34 pages and has 2 principal parts. The first part entitled “Section 1—General Personal Property Form” identifies certain covered property and contains specific exclusions. The second part entitled “Section II—Special MultiPeril Policy Liability Insurance” provides liability coverage. The policy was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.