Gross

Santa Clara Valley Water District v. Gross

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 420·200 Cal. App. 3d 1363·246 Cal. Rptr. 580
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 1988H002633California3,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brauer, J.

In this condemnation action, the property owners, Robert Gross and Yolanda Gross (hereafter collectively Gross), appeal from a postjudgment order which had denied them litigation expenses on the ground that they had not complied with Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410. That statute provides that a property owner must file a final demand for compensation and the condemnor, here the Santa Clara Valley Water District (the Water District), must file a final offer, both at least 30 days prior to the trial date. Entitlement to litigation expenses is thereafter conditioned upon a finding that the condemnor’s offer was unreasonable and the property owner’s demand was reasonable, in light of the amount of the judgment and the evidence adduced at trial.

Gross is a member of the board of directors of the Water District. Neither party made a section 1250.410 filing in this case because both believed that they were precluded from engaging in negotiations with one another by virtue of Government Code section 1090, which prohibits a board member from having any financial interest in any contract with his public agency or selling property to the agency.

The issue on appeal is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.