People v. Superior Court (Drummer)

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 324·200 Cal. App. 3d 105·245 Cal. Rptr. 825
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 1988B033219California890 words

Opinion

Opinion

The issue raised by this mandate petition is whether Health and Safety Code section 11488.2 establishes a 15-day statute of limitations for the filing of a petition for forfeiture of currency alleged to be the proceeds of drug trafficking. The Legislature has since specified a one-year statute of limitations. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11488.4, subd. (a), effective Sept. 22, 1987.) This new provision, however, will expire on Janu ary 1, 1989, unless the Legislature acts anew. (Id, § 11488.4, subd. (/).) Section 11488.2 has not been repealed or amended.

Executing a search warrant at real parties’ home on April 29, 1987, officers of the Los Angeles County sheriff’s department found and seized, inter alia, drugs and a large amount of currency. In the next 15 days, the sheriff’s department did not initiate forfeiture proceedings; nor did it return the currency to real parties. The record does not suggest the existence of a notice to withhold issued by the Franchise Tax Board. On July 7—some 69 days after the seizure—the sheriff’s department brought the seizure to the attention of the district attorney’s forfeiture unit. The district attorney filed a petition for forfeiture (§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.