Edmonds

Rogers v. Edmonds

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 400·200 Cal. App. 3d 1237·248 Cal. Rptr. 15
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 1988A037866California1,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Poche, J.

Defendant Real Estate Commissioner (Commissioner) appeals from an order directing him to pay plaintiffs, Dr. and Mrs. Rogers, $38,420.79 from the Real Estate Recovery Account. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10471.) We affirm the order.

The Recovery Account in the Real Estate Fund (Fund) created by section 10470 et seq. is “a special fund supported by license fees to compensate individuals who are defrauded by real estate licensees.” (Vinci v. Edmonds (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1251, 1254 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 308 ].) Section 10471, subdivision (a), as it read at the date of the order appealed from provided that once “an aggrieved person obtains a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction against a defendant based upon the defendant’s fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, or conversion of trust funds arising directly out of any transaction in which the defendant, while licensed under this part, performed acts for which that license was required, the aggrieved person may, upon the judgment becoming final, file an application . . . for payment from the Recovery Account, . . .” (Former § 10471, added by Stats. 1985, ch. 690, § 3, p. 2293-2294.)

Dr. and Mrs. Rogers made real estate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.