In Re Marriage of Knickerbocker

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 232·1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1374·43 Cal. App. 3d 1039
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1974Civ. 31610California3,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rouse, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage. Appellant alleges error on the part of the trial court in its finding that certain realty is the separate property of respondent; in failing to award spousal support to appellant; and in rendering a judgment which was not sufficiently certain so as to permit its enforcement.

Appellant and respondent were married in the State of Illinois on June 16, 1951. Respondent had been married before and had been awarded a residence and certain household goods upon the termination of her prior marriage. Subsequently, she sold the residence and married appellant. Following their marriage, a home was purchased with respondent’s money. The couple moved to California soon thereafter and that home was sold. Two rental units were purchased by downpay ments of $1,000 and $2,000 from monies realized on the sale. At the dissolution proceeding the trial judge granted a decree of divorce, concluded that the rental properties were the separate property of the wife, and ordered the community property to be divided equally between the parties.

Appellant contends on appeal that the trial court’s determination that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.