Orr

People v. Orr

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 738·1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 1346·43 Cal. App. 3d 666
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1974Crim. 7451California2,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paras, J.

Defendant was charged with grand theft of a bovine animal and assault with a deadly weapon. (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. 3; 245, subd. (a).) The jury found him guilty on both offenses and also of using a firearm (a .22 caliber rifle) in connection with the assault. (Pen. Code, § 12022.5.)

On appeal, defendant raises the following three contentions: 1. The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of grand theft because it was not shown that he took part in the shooting or transporting of the animal.

2. The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of assault with a deadly weapon because it was not shown that defendant had the present ability to commit a violent injury on Donald James Henderson, the victim.

3. The trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of drawing or exhibiting a firearm.

Facts

A heifer belonging to rancher Terrill Whitlock was shot four times in the head with a .22 caliber rifle sometime in the early morning of October 19, 1973. The animal had been killed in the pasture about 200 feet from the fence which ran along a public road. The carcass had been dragged through an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.