Gorton

Gorton v. Todd

Good Law
793 F. Supp. 2d 1171·2011 WL 2557508·85 Fed. R. Serv. 932·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69615
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 2011CIV. S-08-3069 LKK/GGH PCalifornia8,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

Karlton, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff, an indigent prisoner who was initially proceeding with limited representation for the purposes of this motion, brings claims against prison medical officers and U.C. Davis Medical Center physicians contending that their treatment of his kidney disorders fell below constitutional adequacy. Plaintiff requested appointment of a medical expert, which was denied by the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge subsequently recommended that this court grant summary judgment for the U.C. Davis defendants largely due to the lack of expert testimony supporting plaintiffs claims. This court denied their motion for summary judgment without prejudice and sought volunteer counsel to represent plaintiff on the limited question of whether his constitutional rights were offended by the Magistrate Judge’s denial of his request for appointment of a medical expert. At oral argument, counsel appointed for plaintiff indicated that they intend to continue representing him following resolution of this motion.

For the reasons discussed below, the court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s denial of plaintiffs request for appointment of an impartial expert witness was clearly erroneous,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.