Moore

Moore v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 3d 235·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1992·215 Cal. Rptr. 316
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 1985D001757California3,980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Lawrence V. Moore and Walter F. Whelan, Jr., appeal from an order denying their petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to set aside a decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board) denying them unemployment compensation benefits on the ground they were discharged for misconduct under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. They contend the evidentiary record does not support the trial court’s findings of misconduct, but shows their refusal to work was based upon a good-faith, reasonable fear for their safety within the workplace. They also urge they were denied a fair hearing by the administrative law judge discouraging their use of the subpoena power. For the reasons which follow, we conclude the record does not support the trial court’s findings of misconduct. We reverse the order.

Factual and Procedural Background

Moore and Whelan are electrician members of Local 569 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. In July 1982, their names came up on the union hall waiting list, assigning them to Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel) at the San Onofre nuclear generating plant. They accepted the referral. Had they refused the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.