Keele

Keele v. Reich

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 3d 1129·1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2195·215 Cal. Rptr. 756
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 1985B006768California1,557 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring a lien against the real property of plaintiff/appellant. We reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. In 1978, respondent entered into a limited partnership agreement with Michael L. Keele (hereafter referred to as Keele). Respondent filed suit against Keele for breach of his obligations under the limited partnership agreement. A judgment for money was entered against Keele on May 4, 1981.

Respondent recorded the abstract of judgment on October 28, 1981. Keele’s social security number and driver’s license number were marked “unknown” on the abstract of judgment even though Keele’s social security number was contained in an exhibit to respondent’s verified complaint against Keele.

After the abstract of judgment was recorded, Keele conveyed his interest in the subject property to appellant in divorce proceedings. Appellant filed suit for a declaration that respondent’s lien against her property was invalid under Code of Civil Procedure section 674 because the abstract did not record her former husband’s social security number. The court held the abstract substantially complied with section 674 and established a lien against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.