Soto

People v. Soto

Caution
141 Cal. Rptr. 343·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1913·74 Cal. App. 3d 267
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 197715789California4,719 words

Opinion

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P.J.

The People have appealed [1] from orders of the trial court that sustained the motions of the defendants Soto and West, under section 995 of the Penal Code, insofar as they sought dismissal of so much of the first count of the information, charging kidnaping for ransom in violation of section 209 of the Penal Code, as alleged that the victim suffered bodily harm, and that sustained the motion of the defendant Soto for dismissal of the second count charging him with assault to commit rape in violation of section 220 of the Penal Code.

The defendant West, through her attorney, has elected not to file a brief or appear at oral argument on this appeal. Since the argument on behalf of the People with respect to both issues stresses actions solely attributable to the defendant Soto, and fails to show how acts attributable jointly or severally to both defendants could alone warrant the charge of bodily harm, we affirm the order as to defendant West.

Following oral argument in this case, the Attorney General advised the court that the defendant Soto had been convicted by verdict of a jury of kidnaping for ransom in violation of section 209, augmented by use…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.