Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATION

Caution
142 Cal. Rptr. 1·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1965·74 Cal. App. 2d 762·74 Cal. App. 3d 762
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1977Docket Nos. 37997, 37998, 37999, 38004California15,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

In these consolidated actions, Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific) appeals from adverse judg ments entered on ten-two verdicts in favor of the tenants and owners, who sought property damages after Southern Pacific’s Kentucky Street warehouse (warehouse) was completely destroyed by a five-alarm fire on June 29, On its appeals, Southern Pacific contends that the cumulative effect of the following errors on the only and close issue of its liability requires, reversal: 1) insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment and verdict, as there was no substantial evidence of its negligence; 2) the court’s conditional res ipsa instruction and refusal of Southern Pacific’s proffered instructions on contributory negligence and BAJI No. 3.13 (right to assume the good conduct of others); 3) the admission into evidence of certain accident reports prepared by some of Southern Pacific’s employees; 4) the introduction into evidence of a request for the admission of interrogatories propounded by Southern Pacific to its codefendant Reikes, and Reikes’ responses; and 5) the exclusion of Southern Pacific’s evidence as to its duty of reasonable care under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.