Hall

Hall v. University of Nevada

Good Law
141 Cal. Rptr. 439·1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1914·74 Cal. App. 2d 280·74 Cal. App. 3d 280
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 1977Civ. 40858California1,704 words

Opinion

Opinion

Emerson, J.

—Defendants-appellants University of Nevada and the State of Nevada appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,150,000 entered against them in an action brought by respondents for damages for personal injuries. The injuries resulted from a collision between a vehicle occupied by respondents and one driven by Helmut Bohm. It is conceded that, at the time of the accident, Bohm was an employee of the university, a governmental arm of Nevada, and was engaged in official university business. The fact of his agency was not disputed at trial. The accident occurred in California.

Prior to the trial of the case, appellants moved to quash service of summons on the ground that, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, Nevada was not subject to suit in California. That motion was granted. Respondents appealed from the order and in Hall v. University of Nevada (1972) 8 Cal.3d 522 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 355 , 503 P.2d 1363 ], the California Supreme Court reversed, unanimously holding that appellants were not immune from suit in California for the driving of their agent within the scope of his employment or for the permissive use of their car within this state. (Id., at p. 526.) Nevada’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.