Means

Means v. Horel

Good Law
805 F. Supp. 2d 1013·2011 WL 1332177·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40465
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 2011C 08-00827 CRBCalifornia6,219 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner Richard Lee Means seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on various grounds, including his trial counsel’s repeated and inexplicable failure to object to highly incriminating hearsay testimony that the trial court had previously ruled was inadmissible. The state court’s determination that such conduct was not ineffective assistance of counsel is contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, the clearly established federal law articulated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Accordingly, after carefully considering the parties’ arguments and the entire record, the Court GRANTS the petition.

I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case stems from an April 25, 2005 shooting at an apartment complex where Petitioner lived with his family. Pet. Supp. Br. at 4. The victim, Damon Pearson, was at the complex attending a family party when he was shot. Id. at 5. When the police arrived at the scene following the shooting, bystanders told police that “Richard” or the person in apartment 103, was the shooter. Id. at 6.

A. The Motion in Limine

Prior to the commencement of trial, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.