Blegen

Blegen v. Superior Court

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 3d 959·178 Cal. Rptr. 470·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2383
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 1981Civ. 62015California1,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Petitioner is the plaintiff in a pending legal malpractice action. Real parties in interest are defendants in that action. Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandate to challenge respondent court’s order striking a claim for punitive damages. We issued an alternative writ of mandate to review that order.

Petitioner’s complaint alleges that he retained real parties on October 23, 1973, to represent him in prosecuting a medical malpractice action against Kaiser Foundation Hospital and others. The complaint further alleges that petitioner learned of his injuries on July 13, 1973, but that real parties failed to file a lawsuit on his behalf until July 19, 1974. That suit, in addition to being untimely, was defective in that it failed to allege the date of injury or the date of discovery of injury. A demurrer to the medical malpractice action was filed in 1975, but never heard. The medical malpractice action was dismissed with prejudice in 1979, apparently for failure to prosecute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583, subd. (a).) Petitioner alleges that had real parties exercised proper care and skill in prosecuting the medical malpractice action, petitioner would have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.