Coelho

Coelho v. State Personnel Board

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 367·209 Cal. App. 3d 968·257 Cal. Rptr. 557
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1989E004899California802 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

Richard Coelho appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend.

Facts

Appellant Richard Coelho, a warden with the California Department of Fish and Game (Department), received a notice of adverse action alleging inefficiency, inexcusable neglect of duty, dishonesty, and other failure of good behavior causing discredit to the employer. Coelho filed a response, and a hearing was conducted before an administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ upheld the discipline against Coelho. The Personnel Board of the State of California (Board) adopted the ALJ’s findings. Coelho was ordered suspended from duty without pay for four days.

Coelho filed a petition for a peremptory writ against the Board and the director of the Department (respondents). Among other things, Coelho alleged in the petition that the findings of the Board were based upon insufficient evidence and the Board therefore abused its discretion. Respondents filed a demurrer to the motion on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. Coelho filed a response to the demurrer. Following a hearing, the trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.