Conservatorship of Symington

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 407·209 Cal. App. 3d 1464·257 Cal. Rptr. 860
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 1989G0005285California2,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

Glennrose Symington challenges an order granting the Orange County Public Guardian’s petition for appointment as her conservator pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 5352. We affirm.

I

Octogenarian Symington was living alone in her Anaheim mobilehome in late 1986 when she came to the attention of the Mental Health Services for the County of Orange. A “mental health geriatric specialist” reviewed Symington’s living conditions and discovered her mobilehome needed repair and she was unkempt and not providing herself with proper nutrition or hygiene.

The Orange County Public Guardian petitioned the superior court for appointment as conservator, describing Symington as “gravely disabled” within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 5008, subdivi sion (h). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5350 et seq.) The court appointed the public guardian as temporary conservator and scheduled a hearing date. Counsel was assigned for Symington. Through her attorney, she waived a jury trial on the issue of her grave disability. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5350, subd. (d).)

By the time of the conservatorship hearing, Symington had been moved to a residential facility. Dr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.