Baber

Baber v. Napa State Hospital

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 296·209 Cal. App. 3d 213·257 Cal. Rptr. 55
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1989A039654California2,942 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haning, J.

Appellant was nonsuited on his opening statement in his action against the State of California for injuries received while involuntarily hospitalized at Napa State Hospital. He contends, inter alia, the trial court erred in ruling he had not stated a prima facie exception under Government Code section 855, subdivision (a) to the immunity conferred upon respondent by section 854.8, subdivision (a).

Facts and Procedural History

On July 9, 1977, appellant was involuntarily hospitalized at Napa State Hospital as a gravely disabled conservatee under the Lanterman-PetrisShort (LPS) Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.) On that date he was attacked by two other patients, who forcefully subdued him and stabbed a pencil into his right eye, causing permanent loss of sight therein. His complaint alleged that respondent was negligent in placing him and the two patients who attacked him on the same ward (Ward A-5); failing to segregate violent from nonviolent patients; inadequately or insufficiently training Ward A-5 staff; insufficiently or inadequately supervising appellant and his attackers; providing inadequate security on Ward A-5; providing inadequate or insufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.