Morrison

Morrison v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 916·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2207·65 Cal. App. 3d 245
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1976Civ. 14574California1,575 words

Opinion

Opinion

Whelan, J.

Juanita A. Morrison has appealed from a judgment of the superior court denying her petition for writ of mandate directed to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board).

Board had denied Morrison’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground she had voluntarily quit her employment without good cause. Morrison took the appropriate administrative steps before seeking the writ of mandate.

Studio-Girl-Hollywood, Inc. (Studio Girl) is the real party in interest. It is engaged in the sale and distribution of cosmetics and related merchandise, nation-wide.

The petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) alleged that Morrison terminated her employment because of discrimination against her in her employment based upon her sex. More precisely the discrimination was in a substantial difference in salary for services of equal value, unfavorable to Morrison. Board’s return to the alternative writ admitted such discrimination but denied that under the circumstances it afforded good cause for voluntary termination by an employee.

The return of the real party in interest consisted of a demurrer to the petition.

The following findings of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.