Lyons
Lyons v. Stevenson
Opinion
Opinion
Bray, J.
Defendant and appellant Cyril Stevenson appeals from a judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court in favor of plaintiff and respondent Frederick Ogden Lyons.
Issues Presented
1) Plaintiff is entitled to a commission even though he is not licensed as a corporate securities broker.
2) The evidence supports the conclusion that plaintiff acted in the capacity of a “finder” rather than a “broker.”
3) The trial court properly pierced the corporate veil.
Record
A complaint for a commission filed by plaintiff Lyons against defendants Sather Gate Mortgage Company and Cyril Stevenson contains the following allegations: Plaintiff is a duly licensed real estate broker who was employed pursuant to a written agreement by defendants to procure a purchaser for Sather Gate Mortgage Company. Defendants agreed to pay plaintiff a commission of 5 percent of the selling price of the mortgage company. On or about May 31, 1972, plaintiff procured Charles Heneveld and Empire Pacific Properties, Inc. to purchase the business and defendants sold the business to Charles Heneveld and Empire Pacific Properties, Inc. for $165,000. Defendants are indebted to plaintiff in the sum of…