Patillo

Patillo v. Norris

Good Law
135 Cal. Rptr. 210·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2203·65 Cal. App. 3d 209
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1976Civ. 48809California3,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashby, J.

This case- involves determining the rights of the parties when a man with two wives and a child dies intestate, having designated a neighbor lady as the beneficiary of his employment-related life insurance policy and union pension fund death benefit.

The record on appeal in this case is sketchy and in some respects inadequate. None of the pleadings is contained in the clerk’s transcript. An engrossed settled statement is substituted for a reporter’s transcript of the proceedings. A summary of the evidence was contained in the closing trial brief of one of the parties and was adopted by the trial court as an accurate statement of the evidence. It appears that the case arises out of two interpleader actions by the Prudential Insurance Company of America and the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of Southern California. The puipose of the proceeding was to determine who was entitled to the proceeds, in the sum or $10,488 of a Prudential insurance policy on the life of David Oliver Patillo, deceased, and of his preretirement death benefit, in the amount of $8,784, in the Carpenters Pension Trust Fund. The parties claiming interest in the proceeds are: Clydia Patillo, the first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.