Kruser

Kruser v. Bank of America NT&SA

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 523·230 Cal. App. 3d 741·281 Cal. Rptr. 463·91 Daily Journal DAR 6236·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4014
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 1991F012981California2,782 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

In this appeal we interpret the language of a federal banking regulation establishing the respective liabilities of a bank and a consumer for unauthorized electronic transfers of funds from the consumer’s account.

The Case

Appellants, Lawrence Kruser and Georgene Kruser, filed a complaint against Bank of America NT&SA (Bank) claiming damages for unauthorized electronic withdrawals from their account by someone using Mr. Kruser’s “Versatel” card. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Bank because it determined appellants had failed to comply with the notice and reporting requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA). ( 15 U.S.C. § 1693 -1693r; 12 C.F.R. § 205.6 (b)(2).)

The Facts

The facts are undisputed:

The Krusers maintained a joint checking account with the Bank, and the Bank issued each of them a “Versatel” card and separate personal identification numbers which would allow access to funds in their account from automatic teller machines. The Krusers also received with their cards a “Disclosure Booklet” which provided to the Krusers a summary of consumer liability, the Bank’s business hours, and the address and telephone number by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.