In Re Steven A.

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. Lori A.

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 525·230 Cal. App. 3d 349·281 Cal. Rptr. 335·91 Daily Journal DAR 5929·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3695
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 1991E007706California1,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

Objectors and appellants Steven A., Sr., and Lori A. appeal from an order pursuant to Civil Code section 232, freeing their two children, Steven, Jr., and Kathleen, from parental custody and control. The parents contend that the juvenile court erred in freeing minors from their custody and control because (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s findings a) under section 232, subdivisions (a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(6), and (a)(7); b) that return of minors to appellants would be detrimental to the minors; c) that it is in the best interest and welfare of minors that they be declared free from custody and control of appellants; and d) permanent severance of the parental relationship is the least detrimental alternative to secure the best interests of the minors; (2) the court erred in finding appellants were provided reasonable reunification services; (3) the court failed to hear minors’ testimony, as required by section 232, subdivision (b); and (4) the court failed to provide the mother with separate counsel.

I.

Procedural Background

The petition to free minors from parental custody and control alleged that the parents had neglected or cruelly treated minors…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.