Studley

Studley v. Benicia Unified School District

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 541·230 Cal. App. 3d 454·281 Cal. Rptr. 631·91 Daily Journal DAR 6271·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3911
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 1991A044561California2,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

The plaintiff in a personal injury suit, Christine Studley (hereafter Studley), appeals from an adverse judgment in a suit in intervention brought by the defendants’ insurer.

On June 4, 1987, Studley filed a complaint alleging causes of action for negligence and wrongful death against Benicia Unified School District, Daniel R., and Leonard R. A potential plaintiff, Daryl D., was also named as a defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 382 but was never served. On October 2, 1987, Fire Insurance Exchange (hereafter FIE), an interinsurance exchange, filed a complaint in intervention against Studley and each defendant alleging that Daniel R. and Leonard R. had tendered to it the defense of the action under a homeowner’s package policy issued to Daniel R. Acknowledging it had accepted the defense of Daniel R., FIE asked for the declaration that its policy did not provide coverage for Leonard R. and that it was under no obligation to defend him against any potential liability in the case.

A hearing on May 4, 1988, achieved a series of settlements: Benicia Unified School District settled with Studley for the payment of $15,000; FIE agreed to dismiss its complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.