Blake

Blake v. Superior Court

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 3d 244·166 Cal. Rptr. 470·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2050
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 1980Civ. 19072California2,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

Evans, J.

Penal Code section 859b has been held to provide an absolute right in favor of persons in custody charged with felonies to have a preliminary examination commenced within 10 court days after they have been arraigned. (Serrato v. Superior Court (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 459, 464 [ 142 Cal.Rptr. 882 ].)

The primary question presented by this writ petition is whether the absolute right to a preliminary examination within 10 days of arraignment applies to petitioner who, at the time of his arraignment, was confined in Folsom Prison following a conviction on unrelated charges.

We conclude that the legislative reason for eliminating good cause extensions of the 10-day preliminary hearing requirement does not apply to those persons in custody not entitled to bail.

Petitioner was indicted July 31, 1979, and arraigned August 10, 1979; he requested a postindictment preliminary hearing (Hawkins v. Superior Court (1978) 22 Cal.3d 584 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 435 , 586 P.2d 916 ]), and that hearing was not conducted until September 12, 1979, following four continuances, each granted upon a finding of good cause.

On August 30, 1979, petitioner made a motion to dismiss, asserting the provisions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.