Johnson v. Cayman Development Co.

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 3d 977·167 Cal. Rptr. 29·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2131
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 1980Civ. 57623California1,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiff in intervention and appellant Royal Indemnity Company (Royal) appeals from a judgment disallowing it any recovery from defendant and respondent Cayman Development Company (Cayman).

Introduction and Statement of Facts

This case arises out of an injury to plaintiff in the case in chief, Herbert Johnson (Johnson), who was employed as a plaster tender for Norpal Plastering, Inc. On April 17, 1974, Johnson was working on a job site where Cayman was the general contractor, and he fell while carrying a hod of plaster down a hill. Royal was the insurer for Norpal Plastering.

Subsequent to the accident, Johnson filed an application with the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, and benefits totaling $22,538.90 were ultimately paid to Johnson by Royal.

Meanwhile, Johnson filed a third party action against various defendants, including Cayman. Royal intervened in the action to protect its lien rights.

Before the trial, Johnson purportedly settled with Cayman for $30,000. However, since no similar agreement could be arrived at between Royal and Cayman, Royal proceeded to try the lawsuit separately against Cayman.

At the trial, evidence was presented regarding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.