Lieding

Lieding v. Commercial Diving Center

Bad Law
143 Cal. App. 2d 72·143 Cal. App. 3d 72·191 Cal. Rptr. 559·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1736
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 1983Civ. 66760California1,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Scott Lieding and Karey Lieding, husband and wife, sued Commercial Diving Center and Oceaneering International, Inc., alleging that on April 14, 1980, husband sustained personal injuries in a diving accident while he was a commercial diving student under the instruction and supervision of defendants; as a result of husband’s injuries, wife was deprived of his “services, social and consortium,” to which she is entitled. Husband sought damages for his injuries on several theories and wife (in the seventh cause of action of the complaint) sought damages for loss of consortium. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the seventh cause of action. The motion was supported by wife’s answers to interrogatories stating that she and husband were not married at the time of his alleged diving accident. In opposition to the motion plaintiffs submitted declarations wherein they stated that on March 9, 1980, husband asked wife to marry him; at that time they selected May 31, 1980, as the tentative wedding date; because of husband’s accident the wedding was postponed and plaintiffs were married on August 2, 1980. The motion was granted on the ground that wife cannot recover damages for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.