Karlin

Karlin v. Zalta

Caution
154 Cal. App. 3d 953·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1939·201 Cal. Rptr. 379
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 1984Civ. 67698California12,838 words

Opinion

Opinion

Auerbach, J.

I. Introduction

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to the complaint of Barbara Karlin (Karlin) was sustained without leave to amend. Karlin instituted this action for herself personally and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated. The defendants in whose favor judgment was rendered are Dr. Edward Zalta (Dr. Zalta), Southern California Physicians Council, Inc. (SOCAP), a California corporation, the Phoenix Insurance Company (hereinafter Phoenix), a Connecticut corporation, the Travelers Corporation, a Connecticut corporation, the Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut corporation, the Travelers Indemnity Company of America, a Georgia corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island, a Rhode Island corporation (sometimes collectively referred to as the Travelers Group or insurance defendants).

II. Statement of the Case

A. The Allegations of the Complaint

The substance of the nine-count pleading revolves around the right to ownership of a fund worth approximately $22 million. This amount (and more is allegedly due) is claimed to have been wrongfully obtained from plaintiff and her class, which consists…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.