Davis

People v. Davis

Bad Law
154 Cal. App. 3d 253·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1879·201 Cal. Rptr. 422
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1984A021152California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

Racanelli, J.

III. Worktime Credits

Defendant was sentenced to 4 years in prison with credit for time served (128 days) and good time/work time (64 days). Defendant now contends he should have been given additional credits under the new worktime credits provided under Penal Code section 2933.

The contention is faulty for several reasons. Penal Code section 2933 establishes a new program of worktime credits for prison inmates alone. The obvious purpose of the statutory program is to provide incentives for prisoners to work in one of the new prison industries and thereby to develop job skills and work ethics. (Stats. 1982, ch. 1, § 1, p. 1; Pen. Code, §§ 2800, 2801 [Prison Industry Authority created to operate various industrial, agricultural and service enterprises employing prisoners].) Such valid statutory objectives have no relevance to pretrial detainees.

Defendant’s reliance on People v. Sage (1980) 26 Cal.3d 498 [ 165 Cal.Rptr. 280 , 611 P.2d 874 ] [good time credits uniformly available to sentenced prisoners and pretrial detainees on equal protection grounds] is misplaced. Sage extended good time credits to pretrial detainee felons as being similarly situated to prison inmates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.