Buckhart

Buckhart v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

Good Law
197 Cal. App. 3d 1032·1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 41·243 Cal. Rptr. 298
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1988A032906California1,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elkington, J.

Defendants San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board (Board), and real party in interest Lynn McDonald (Ms. McDonald), appeal from a judgment of the superior court granting the Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 application of plaintiff Norman C. Buckhart (Buckhart) for a writ of mandate requiring the Board to set aside its decision in favor of Ms. McDonald, and to enter a decision in favor of Buckhart.

We state certain of the material factual-procedural circumstances of the appeal as they appear uncontroverted by the parties’ briefs, and concessions of the Board.

San Francisco has a residential rent control ordinance (Ordinance) which treats a decrease in “housing services” during one’s tenancy as a forbidden rental increase. Disputes between a landlord and tenant are heard and determined at a hearing by a hearing officer. At the hearing the parties will “offer . . . such . . . evidence as may be pertinent to the proceedings. . . . A record of the proceedings must be maintained .... Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing . . . the hearing officer . . . shall make written findings of fact.” But for the “right of appeal” the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.