Burgess

People v. Burgess

Good Law
206 Cal. App. 3d 762·253 Cal. Rptr. 828
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1988Docket Nos. H002975, H003998California2,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [†] ]

OPINION

HANING, J.

Vernon Lee Burgess appeals his conviction by jury trial of possession of stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496); [1] grand theft (§§ 484/487, subd. 3); offering to sell PCP (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.5); and robbery (§ 211). (1a) His primary contention is that the substitution of a regular juror with an alternate constituted double jeopardy. He has also petitioned for habeas corpus, claiming that his trial counsel's failure to formally enter a plea of former jeopardy (§ 1016, subd. 5) deprived him of the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment and deny the petition.

Since appellant does not attack the sufficiency of the evidence, we need not set forth the circumstances of the crimes in great detail. Basically, appellant was positively identified as the person who came into a Stop N' Go convenience store on March 17, 1986, and took a bottle of liquor without paying. When the clerk tried to stop him, appellant shoved the clerk to the floor and fled. He also sold a stolen video cassette recorder and stolen automobile to undercover officers participating in a "sting" operation. Finally, he arranged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.