Isaia

People v. Isaia

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 3·206 Cal. App. 3d 1558·254 Cal. Rptr. 500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 1989F009905California1,936 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamlin, J.

Upon a trial by the court at which the issue of defendant’s guilt was submitted upon the transcript of the preliminary hearing, defendant was convicted of unauthorized possession of marijuana in a prison farm in violation of Penal Code section 4573.6. Defendant appeals his felony conviction, contending the municipal court was correct in finding that the crime was a misdemeanor; thus his guilty plea to the misdemeanor charge should stand. Defendant’s contention requires us to construe section 18; the construction we adopt dictates that we reject defendant’s contention and affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant was an inmate of the Stanislaus County Honor Farm when a marijuana cigarette was found in his possession. Following the preliminary hearing on the charge of unauthorized possession of drugs in a prison farm, the municipal court found, pursuant to section 17, subdivision (b)(5), and section 18, that defendant’s crime was a misdemeanor. Defendant pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor violation.

The superior court overturned the municipal court’s finding and ordered that the municipal court’s order reducing the charge to a misdemeanor be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.