Lunghi

Lunghi v. Clark Equipment Co.

Good Law
153 Cal. App. 3d 485·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1798·200 Cal. Rptr. 387
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 1984AO14969California4,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

This appeal is from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of defendant Clark Equipment Company, Inc. (Clark), manufacturer of a Bobcat front-end model 440 loader, in a wrongful death action brought by the survivors of a man (Lunghi) who was crushed to death in August 1976 by the descending boom and bucket of a Bobcat front-end model 440 loader when he tried to rescue a fellow employee (Perez) whose hand had become trapped in the loader’s framework while he was trying to repair a battery. The loader was manufactured by the Melrose Company, which had been purchased by Clark in 1969. The jury returned a special verdict with a 10-to-2 vote that there was no defect in the design of the loader.

The issues on appeal are whether the trial court erred in: (1) refusing to allow plaintiffs to introduce testimony of an expert who had been hired by defendant and deposed during discovery but not called by defendant to testify during trial; (2) refusing to give plaintiffs’ requested jury instructions on the manufacturer’s liability for negligence; (3) refusing plaintiffs’ request to instruct the jury on the consumer expectations aspect of strict liability; and (4) altering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.