Laport

People v. Laport

Good Law
189 Cal. App. 3d 281·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1369·234 Cal. Rptr. 399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1987B015315California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

—Defendant Jeanette Dee Laport was found guilty by a jury of grand theft, Penal Code section 487.1, subdivision (1). The single count in the information alleged that Laport committed the crime of grand theft between April 1983 and June 1984.

The evidence showed that during her tenure as a business manager for an art gallery, Laport embezzled approximately $18,000 by writing checks to herself. She also stole some paintings worth over $5,000.

Laport’s defense was that she believed she was authorized to take the money because of her intimate relationship with the owner of the art gallery. She threw the cancelled checks away so that the owner’s wife would not learn about their relationship. She took the paintings home to show a client.

Laport’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury sua sponte with CALJIC No. 17.01 which requires the jury be unanimous in determining what acts constitute the offense of grand theft. We agree and reverse the conviction.

Discussion

CALJIC No. 17.01 provides: “The defendant is charged with the offense of_. He may be found guilty if the proof shows beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.