Frantz

Frantz v. Blackwell

Good Law
189 Cal. App. 3d 91·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1357·234 Cal. Rptr. 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1987H001473California1,722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Agliano, J.

—Phillip J. Frantz appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm.

Frantz sued Jack R. Blackwell, Jack R. Blackwell, Inc., and Blackwell Homes, Inc., in a first amended complaint alleging discrimination violative of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code section 51 et seq., and of the common law doctrine concerning enterprises affected with a public calling (a third cause of action was merely a prayer seeking to enjoin the discrimination which was alleged in the first two causes of action). The operative allegation of discrimination had its genesis in a prior encounter between these litigants.

Frantz is a licensed real estate broker or agent. Blackwell develops and sells single family homes to the public. On August 1,1979, Frantz contracted to purchase from Blackwell lot 282 of Pierce Ranch subdivision No. 3, located in San Jose. After a disagreement, Blackwell rescinded the contract on September 20,1979. Frantz, however, sued for specific performance. The suit was dismissed on September 22, 1980, after a settlement was reached whereby Blackwell paid Frantz $35,000.

In May 1984, Frantz tried to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.