Nussbaum

Nussbaum v. Weeks

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1096·214 Cal. App. 3d 1589·263 Cal. Rptr. 360
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1989E004893California5,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

Action for nondisclosure in the purchase of an 80-acre parcel of real property. The seller sued, alleging that the buyer, the general manager of a water district, had a fiduciary duty to disclose his intention to cause a change in water policy affecting the subject real property. The jury found in favor of the seller and the general manager appeals.

Historical Background

The Coachella Valley Water District (District) provides Colorado River water to the Coachella Valley through the Coachella Canal. The District maintains a water distribution system which provides irrigation water to certain properties in the valley. Properties originally classified as soil types 1 through 5 receive water through the distribution system. The subject property, located south of Indio, has class 6 soil. Class 6 soil was originally thought to be less suitable for agricultural purposes and was therefore excluded from the distribution system. Nevertheless, in the late ’40’s, class 6 lands were able to receive water in some circumstances by applying to the District.

In 1954, the board of directors of the District decided to cease approving applications for water to class 6 lands. This decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.