People v. Superior Court (Quinn)

Good Law
147 Cal. Rptr. 921·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1793·83 Cal. App. 3d 609
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 1978Civ. 17718California2,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Puglia, J.

The People petition for relief from the order of the trial court suppressing evidence in a criminal prosecution in which the real parties in interest, Samuel and Diana Quinn, are defendants. The questions presented in this proceeding concern the legality of the arrests of defendants and one Rodney Lee. Extraordinary relief is the appropriate remedy for the People in these circumstances (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (o)). We have issued an alternative writ and stayed further proceedings in the trial court pending our further order.

Shortly after noon on January 25, 1978, a 1974 model Porsche was stolen in Oakland. In Quincy, at approximately 10:50 the following morning, Deputy Sheriff Gamberg, on patrol in a sheriff’s car, observed the Porsche parked behind a storage shed in back of the Fun and Games Arcade (Arcade). The Arcade building houses a commercial entertainment establishment and separate living quarters for the proprietors who at the time of these events were the defendants Quinn.

The Porsche was substantially concealed from view from the street. Gamberg, a veteran officer, had never before seen this vehicle. A citizen informant, the former owner of the local bus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.