In Re Marriage of Johnson

Bad Law
134 Cal. App. 3d 148·184 Cal. Rptr. 444·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1843
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 1982Civ. 49441California5,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bancroft, J.

Appellant husband appeals from an interlocutory judgment of dissolution entered on August 31, 1979. He makes various contentions regarding the denial of his motion for continuance, the date of separation, the valuation and distribution of community property, the amounts awarded as child and spousal support, a certain promissory note, the imposition of liens and the lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion as to the note and the liens but otherwise affirmed.

Statement of Facts

Respondent wife (hereafter Jacqueline) by her petition filed April 17, 1979, stated, inter alia, that the parties married on July 1, 1964, in Reno, Nevada, had not separated by the petition’s filing date, and had a male child of 14 years and a female child of 11 years. In his own behalf, appellant husband (hereafter Robert) filed his response on June 4, 1979, conceding that the statistical information in the petition was correct and, for the most part, challenging only Jacqueline’s valuation of the most valuable asset, the family home. Pursuant to an at-issue memorandum filed on June 12, 1979,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.