Willis

Willis v. Soda Shoppes of California, Inc.

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 3d 899·184 Cal. Rptr. 761
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 14, 1982Civ. 27746California1,407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morris, J.

This case comes to us on certification from the appellate department of the superior court.

The question certified is whether a lessor’s consequential damages under Civil Code section 1951.2, subdivision (a) must be offset by any increase in rent obtained by a lessor upon reletting of premises following termination of the original lease.

The trial court resolved this issue in favor of the lessee-defendant, Soda Shoppes of California, Inc., allowing the setoff. We affirm.

The plaintiff-lessors, George Willis and Harriet Willis, commenced this action to recover accrued rent and consequential damages allegedly totaling over $14,000 following the abandonment by Soda Shoppes of commercial premises leased to it by plaintiffs. The defendant Soda Shoppes cross-complained for return of a $1,100 security deposit and for a declaration that they were entitled to offset against the rent and damages all sums received and to be received by plaintiffs upon the re-letting of the premises.

The trial court gave judgment in favor of the lessee-defendant on the complaint, holding that all of the damages plaintiffs, the lessors, incurred due to the lessee-defendants’ breach of the lease…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.