Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London

Good Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 47·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1403·56 Cal. App. 3d 791
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1976Civ. 45823California5,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beach, J.

Appellants and respondent Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Aetna) were insurers of Union Oil Company (Union) in January 1969, at the time of the Santa Barbara oil well blow-out. Aetna defended Union to the exhaustion of the $50,000 monetary limit of its policy. The instant action for equitable subrogation and declaratory relief was filed be,cause Aetna, although continuing to defend Union, believes its duty to defend ended at the exhaustion of the policy limit; that the other insurers should now take over defense of claims against Union; and that the legal fees and other expenses incurred by Aetna after the exhaustion of the policy limits should be paid to Aetna by the other insurers.

The trial court ordered that from the date of judgment Lloyds shall have the primary responsibility of defense; that Harbor has exhausted its policy limits so no longer shares this responsibility; and that the costs of defense should be apportioned based on a ratio of the amount paid by each insurer to the total amount of such indemnity payments paid by all insurers in the settlement of claims or the satisfactions of judgments. The trial court further ordered that Aetna recover from Harbor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.