In Re Walker

Good Law
128 Cal. Rptr. 291·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1341·56 Cal. App. 3d 225
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1976Crim. 2587California1,075 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

On January 2, 1976, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in propria persona with this court. Thereafter, the Supreme Court granted this court’s request to have the petition considered in conjunction with petitioner’s direct appeal from his conviction (5 Crim. No. 1897.)

Petitioner’s basic contention is that his rights and guarantees under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the California Constitution were violated by his being denied the right to represent himself on appeal.

Petitioner also contends that his privileges under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the California Constitution were violated and denied by forcing onto petitioner allegedly incompetent and inadequate appointed counsel on appeal while denying petitioner his right of self-representation.

Neither of these contentions has merit.

Petitioner has no constitutional right of self-representation on appeal.

“An appeal from a judgment of conviction is not a matter of absolute right, independently of constitutional or statutory provisions allowing such appeal. A review by an appellate court of the final judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.