Fortenberry

Fortenberry v. Weber

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 3d 213·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1377·95 Cal. Rptr. 834
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1971Civ. 26498California3,705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Caldecott, J.

Elizabeth Fortenberry brought an action to recover damages, including exemplary damages, against Francis I. duPont & Co., and its employees, Gene D. Weber and Edward A. White, for mismanagement of a securities account.

On February 29, 1968, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. Notice of entry of judgment was filed March 4, 1968. On March 15, 1968, plaintiff filed a notice of a motion for a new trial. The motion was granted on May 3, 1968. On May 8, 1968, the trial court filed a specification of the reasons for granting the motion for a new trial. On July 1, 1968, defendants filed a notice of appeal from the order granting the motion for a new trial. On July 5, 1968, plaintiff filed a notice of cross-appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiff’s securities account was opened with the San Francisco office of Francis I. duPont & Co. on or about April 4, 1957, when the first securities trade was made on her behalf. At the time, plaintiff (then Miss Elizabeth Kleiner) was a student at the University of California, residing in Berkeley. After graduating in the early summer of 1957, she returned to her native State of Texas, where she remained a permanent resident,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.