Franklin

Franklin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 3d 682·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1421·96 Cal. Rptr. 201·36 Cal. Comp. Cases 429
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 1971Civ. 37409California681 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Petitioner, born in 1922, injured his back on December 28, 1957, in the course of his employment as sales manager for respondent Sues, Young and Brown, Inc. Temporary disability was furnished for the maximum of 240 weeks. He has had extensive medical treatment, including five spinal surgeries. On October 20, 1969, the referee issued an award for 100 percent permanent disability. On December 5, 1969, the appeals board granted a reconsideration and directed that petitioner be examined by an independent medical examiner. Purportedly on the basis of that report, the board directed the rating bureau to rate for back disability limiting petitioner to “semi-sedentary” work and use of a back brace. After subsequent cross-examination of the independent medical examiner and the rating specialist, the board amended its instructions to call for a rating for back disability limiting petitioner to “sedentary work” and use of a back brace. That instruction produced a rating of 70 percent disability which, adjusted for petitioner’s age and occupation, resulted in an award of 60 percent. Petitioner’s petition for reconsideration was denied and he petitioned this court for annulment. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.