Burton

Burton v. Gardner Motors, Inc.

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 3d 426·172 Cal. Rptr. 647·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1529
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 1981Civ. 4476California2,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

In this personal injury action plaintiff, Carol Ann Burton, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Gardner Motors, Inc. (hereinafter Gardner).

Plaintiff was injured as a result of a collision between an automobile she was driving and an Audi driven by Michael Higginbotham, in which Tenna Chrismer was riding as a passenger. The Audi had been loaned by Gardner to Chrismer for her use while her car was being repaired. In this action for negligently caused injuries, plaintiff sued Higginbotham, Chrismer and Gardner. The complaint alleges several theories of liability against Gardner, including allegations that Gardner was the owner of the car and that it was being negligently operated by Chrismer and Higginbotham with Gardner’s permission and consent. Ownership and permission and consent are admitted. Chrismer and Gardner were served with the summons and complaint, but Higginbotham was not.

Chrismer made an offer of compromise in the sum of $8,500 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 which was accepted by the plaintiff, and judgment in that sum against Chrismer followed. The judgment was satisfied, and satisfaction of judgment was filed and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.